Short answer: = endowed with its natural ordering
What if you add a largest possible element?
What if you add a new smallest element?
So:
(Read "is isomorphic to" for and "is (isomorphic to) an initial segment of" for ).
Note that is not isomorphic to , since has a largest element, namely , while does not.
|
|
|
|
Moving on:
and
Keep going: for any positive integer
Answer:
(2 copies of )
You can identify each natural number with the ordered set of integers smaller than :
(Note: in contrast to the cases earlier, the in this "definition" is finite.)
Then:
and, as ordered sets:
In general, you can (isomorphically) identify each set above (ordinal) with the set of all smaller ordinals. E.g.:
Beyond addition:
(2 copies of )
( copies of 2)
( copies of )
So:
Answer:
( copies of )
or, isomorphically equivalent: pairs of nonnegative integers with reverse lexicographic ordering
Similarly:
(3-tuples)
(4-tuples)
(-tuples)
What is next?
(-tuples with finitely many nonzero entries)
Other interpretation: the union of all -tuples for with reverse lexicographic ordering.
The picture so far:
Cantor normal form (CNF):
where
are positive integers,
are themselves ordinals, recursively.
CNF is proper .
Side note about CNF: basically only exponentiation and addition; multiplication is redundant.
{all proper CNFs} is itself an ordinal, the smallest ordinal which cannot be defined explicitly using .
is countable and the smallest ordinal such that ; no in proper CNF satisfies this fixed point equation.
There are uncountably many ordinals larger than , but the rest of this document focuses on a Maple package for ordinals in proper CNF, that is, ordinals that are smaller than and their arithmetic.